AI was used can explain very little on its own. Preparing ideas, drafting a translation and generating a realistic-looking image are different contributions. A useful explanation should make the relevant distinction understandable.
Ask why the information matters
Disclosure is meaningful when the production method affects how a reader should assess the material. Knowing that an example is fictional or an image illustrative can change interpretation.
Listing every technical operation does not necessarily create clarity. The reader needs the significant distinction and an accurate account of editorial responsibility.
Make the explanation specific
If assistance was used for a translation draft, the explanation should accurately reflect whether meaning and language were reviewed. An unchecked text should not acquire the appearance of human verification through a reassuring label.
An illustrative scenario and a real project record also need separation. Examples and lived experience raise questions of accuracy regardless of the production tool.
Consider placement and scope
A general editorial-method page can explain the publication’s approach. A specific image’s illustrative status may need an explanation beside that image. Important context should not require a search through distant documents.
This article does not define legal disclosure obligations for every country or use. Relevant requirements need separate assessment when setting policy. The editorial question here is how to help a reader understand what they are seeing.
Match the statement to the process
If sources are said to have been checked, they must actually have been checked. Human editing should mean more than opening the file. Review checkpoints provide the basis for an honest explanation.
Transparency should help readers assess the work, not simply praise or dismiss the tool involved.